DEMOCRACY
AXIOM
The inherent destiny of Social Existence in any Universe
is DEMOCRACY.
Recall Life's billion-year
long journey to LANGUAGE - a trip on metaphorical Buses # 1 to #
6 run by the "Evolution Bus Company"
#
1. SEXUAL REPRODUCTION
# 2. BODILY MOVEMENT
# 3. PERCEPTION
# 4. PRIMARY CONCEPTS
# 5. CONCEPTUAL COMPARISON
That last Bus had
taken Perceptual Life towards first inkling of the "Future",
the "concepts" of "Yes / No" and the command
of Comparative Potentials of Reality - "same / different",
"less / equal / more"
The contention then was that should Perceptual Life additionally
hitch a ride on Bus # 6 - TOOLMAKING, that trip would have remained
inconsequential if it didn't lead to the "exchanges" of
"Tools" for "non-Tools" preceded by the evaluations
of their FAIRNESS
Potential
"exchange" of SAME for DIFFERENT = "less? / equal?
/ more?" > FAIR? = "Yes / No > "conceptual"
COMMENT > linguistic COMMENT
When "consistently
externalised" as Words - COMMENTS on the "fairness"
of "exchanges" create the need for cognate Words to emerge,
permanently keeping open a multi-lane highway to LANGUAGE
Now whilst DEMOCRACY has already been touched upon, several of its
key evolutionary aspects had to be omitted for reasons of brevity.
Thus, it might be worthwhile to more comprehensively retrace Life's
journey on "Evolution Bus Company" to its inevitable destination
of DEMOCRACY.
Bus # 1 - LIFE.
Beyond the "same
/ different" and "least / less / equal / more / most " there is only the contextual NIL of "nothingness". Could
those Potentials have given birth to LIFE?
Consider a known Proportional "inversion" determining
the "bonds" within "permanent" and "conditional" chemical assemblies -
The "greater" the "internal complexity" of those
assemblies - the "greater" the likelihood of "bonding"
amongst them being "conditional", i.e. capable of being disassembled by some "Word sequences" from the vocabulary
of "all possible chemical Word Potentials".
Since Life fulfils the Potential of "expanding" chemical
Complexity within a single assembly, a quandary arises - does the
Complexity of assembly ever "expand >" without a
LIMIT?
wComplexity “expands” by extrapolating from even the “smallest” number of interdependent chemical statements the “largest” number of “different” but “self-referential sequences” dedicated to the “same” overall Potential; “Our aim is to “expand” the Complexity of our assembly indefinitely >”… That Potential also resides in sequence of Words; “we'll continually expand the Complexity of our assembly whilst maintaining its UNITY”.
Now look at the "functional difference" between two imperatives;
"expand Complexity" and "maintain UNITY". Are
they compatible with the overall aim of "expanding" that
assembly's Complexity INDEFINITELY?
Suppose you've set
out to randomly build continually "larger" assembly an
indefinite number of times. Sooner or later, maybe a billion years
later, some random but "self-limiting Word sequence" must
end that process
Why?
wThe original sequences of chemical Words committed to the "same"
aim - "increasing Complexity while maintaining the UNITY of
the Whole", become overrun by the hordes of additional Word
sequences describing "different" chemical agendas; "Yes,
we'll increase the Complexity of the Whole, but its UNITY is none
of our concern".
A kind of chemical Roman Empire adding new conquests destined to
result in its eventual PARTITION
Complexity can long thrive on "expanding" a vast vocabulary
of Words and harnessing them into "different", specialised
Functions - all dedicated to the "same" aim of EXPANSION
>
But ultimately, it overplays its hand -
"Expand Complexity >>>>>>>>>>>>
+ X / + Y / + Z / + "divide the Whole"
The "greater"
the Complexity of interdependent Word permutations within a Whole
of Word Potentials, the "greater" the likelihood of a
limiting sequence "divide the Whole" expressing itself
"self-referentially".
Let's digress. The
Mandelbrot Set is believed to fulfil the ultimate Potential of Numerical
Complexity - apparently no algorithm of Mathematics can create a
"more >" complex, "finite" structure...
Proportionally? Correct. Descriptively? No - its Complexity can
momentarily be increased by "1 more" Descriptive instruction;
"divide the Whole".
A self-evolved division of "conditionally bonded assembly" is the universal LIMIT
to mechanistic Potential of Complexity
It's LIFE.
For Life, that LIMIT is expressed in randomly formed, but evidently
effective Potential - "divide "sameness" into two
"approximately equal Proportions", each retaining the
"sameness" of "dividing" into two "approximately
equal Proportions, each retaining the "sameness" of "dividing"
into etc
>>>>>".
Here, the "approximation of equal" becomes a CATALYST
of Evolution.
wAlthough the last several paragraphs may additionally be translated
with an utmost exactitude into tongue-twisting Words of Biochemistry
- both sets of Words only arise from the "same" Chemical
Potentials.
The main Proportional
and Descriptive aspects of Life's "divisions" can be displayed
as the following "repetitive pattern"-
becomes
-
"same" |
"same".. |
"< less /
/ more >" + "<
less /
/ more >"
|
Once this first "division"
takes place - the Travails of Life had only started
Since these two off-spring consist of 50 % of their progenitor's
"Bio-mass", each must try restore itself to 100 %, as
dictated by the "genetic sameness" with that progenitor.
Given enough "repetition", some will find the way...
The
real challenge comes further down the course of Evolution, for
without its resolution Life's place in the Universe would have
no significance -
Bus # 2 - BODILY LIFE
Where do the BODIES
of Life come from?
Yes, all the "functional" bits and pieces out of which
"bodily Life"; from the "trilobites", to "fish",
to "dinosaurs", etc
eventually "proto-humans"
then "humans", has been put together by Evolution
Shortly after Sexual Reproduction has arisen about billion years
ago, Life's genetic complexity, physiological diversity and consequently,
consumption of Energy have expanded at an unprecedented rate...
And the source of that
Energy? In the main, the "Bio-mass" of other Life
Since initially, Life's "Energy requirements" would only
be replenished from "Bio-mass" occurring within its Environment
randomly - it had to depend on the availability of that "Bio-mass"
being "
/ equal to / more then" its on-going
Energy consumption
What about the perilous "less then /
/
"?
A problem - survive through the periods when "Bio-mass"
cannot be found within your Environment in SUFFICIENT time
Simple - keep saving a SURPLUS of "Bio-mass" next to your
basic "cellular structure". Once that happens, you should
survive that period by borrowing your on-going Energy needs from
your own RESERVE
That's how in a game of evolutionary poker "a three" of
"less / equal / more" has beaten the Archetype of Life
- "a pair" of "
/ equal / more".
Those first "accumulations of SURPLUS" provided the "repetitive
patterns" from which all BODIES - culminating in our own, were subsequently
to form.
wInitially, "Bodily masses" would grow only in Proportion
to the SURPLUS "sensed" then "absorbed" at random
from the "chemical envelope" of their Environment.
Once "bodily Movement" emerges, "chemical sensors"
direct the Actions of Life to the source of SURPLUS. With "larger
>" Environmental Volumes now being inspected for their SURPLUS-bearing
Potential - "Bodily masses" can grow correspondingly "larger
>".
Some half a billion years ago, the emergence of PERCEPTION pushed those “Bodily masses” over the next threshold of “enlargement” -
"Photo-chemical sensors" Life enable Life to discern the
SURPLUS-bearing Potential at a Distance - within the Environment's three-dimensional depth
Eventually, this leads to the flesh-mountains
of "sauropods", "brontosaurs" and the like
Two million years ago, the “exchanges” of “Tools for “non-Tools” gave us the beginnings of Language, gradually introducing its individual users to a new three-dimensional SURPLUS-bearing Environment - the “remainder of Language users”.
With the development of Organized Agriculture ten millennia ago, the most eloquent translated their sole INTENT of; “Give me part of your Agricultural SURPLUS” into the IDEOLOGIES of Aristocracy and Religion.
This led to the establishment of “SURPLUS-administration” persisting until Modernity and without which any notions of “human civilization” become a historically “inconsistent” irrelevance.
wNow there is no shortage of individuals - some well meaning, others with axes to grind, who sombrely ask; “ What is the Purpose of Life ?”
This would-be profundity, which apparently treats “breakfast”, “lunch” and “dinner” as another way of passing the time, deserves a practical response;
“Stop EATING for some weeks and verily, you shall discover the Purpose of Life…”
The Purpose behind
the Actions of Life - maintaining its "Bodily structures"
in SURPLUS, applies as much to its today's "social equivalents"
as it would to the evolutionary process which secured a "cell's"
Future by provisioning it with its initial "Reserve of SURPLUS"
at the Dawn of Life.
wNot unlike a "Bodily structure", a COMMERCIAL structure
of today has to maintain its on-going "Reserve of Surplus"
- if it is to survive an unexpected or prolonged "less /
/
" period.
No "Reserve of Surplus" - Income "equals" the
Cost of running a Business, and its commercial survival is as precarious
as that of an "organism" whose "acquisition"
of Energy could only "equal" its "consumption"
of Energy - as it would have been the case with Life a billion years
ago.
Whether it's a multi-billion corporation operating from plush offices
across the globe or a motor repair shop in the middle of nowhere,
this Constant will affect their "functional sameness"
with an "equally" unforgiving impartiality.
wStrictly speaking, no... A corporation can conceal its "Surplus-deficiency"
in a thicket of ingenious commercial contrivances and survive -
if artificially, far longer than some "Joe's Motor Repairs".
Ironically - this signals the next
Bus of Evolution
Bus # 3 - the INTENT
of RESTRAINT
How do Descriptive
and Proportional Realities combine as the first SOCIAL Potential
- some archetypal development destined to provide the functional
underpinning to Social Evolution and consequently, to all forms
of eventual Social Existence?
Imagine yourself as a "fish" at an ocean's bottom anywhere
in the Universe.
The predominant Purpose of your Life? Maintaining your "Bodily
structure" in Energy SURPLUS
Your survival hinges on successfully "performing" two
"different, repetitive patterns" of "sameness".
The first is finding "prey", the second is avoiding "predators"
Typically your "prey" will be "smaller" then
your own "equal" and the "predators", "larger"
wNow having just spotted a silhouette of "smaller" fish,
you are darting at it with your jaws open - only to refrain at the
last moment...
The Size is right, but your would-be "prey" just happened
to be the "same" as an offspring of your "own species"
Why not devour this tasty "smaller" kin? Apart from owing
your "existence" to not having been devoured by the "larger"
kin when you were young and "small", no reason whatsoever.
wA rudimentary scenario but by enacting it you had shown a working
grasp of the dual basics of Reality...
At the Proportional level, you - a unit of the "equal",
had proved capable of "performing" 2 "divergent conceptual
intents" - "If smaller, then attack" and "If
larger, then flee"
Ipso facto, the "prey" was
"smaller".
To attack it, you had to form an intent of making the Distance in-between
- a unit of the "equal", progressively "shorter >"
That intent briskly inverts to "longer >" whenever
a "predator" is chasing you.
At the Descriptive level, your target's say, "gold and green
stripe" revealed it to be "different" from "prey"
but the "same" as the young of your species; causing you
to DESIST
However, since you
have neither "attacked" your would-be "prey",
nor "fled away" from it - some additional "Descriptive
concept" must have interceded here
What was its universal
Word Potential?
A few hundred million years in the Future, your unknown descendants
on a planet's landmass could evolve Language and translate that
"concept" into equivalent of our Word "RESTRAINT";
the precondition of Social Existence, its Morality and Ethics
Universally, eloquent social opportunism shall attribute Morality
and Ethics otherworldly origins - then BENEFIT by claiming to represent
those origins.
Cont'd...
AXIOM
Social Agendas are determined at the source of MONEY
paying for their implementation.
SUMMARY
1. MONEY is the life-blood of Democracy .
Money - which after “exchange” and “Democracy”, is the most significant SOCIAL INVENTION which Life can originate any Universe.
Money - which in its archetypal form of “Stone Tools” had shown our most distant ancestors, Homo FABER – MERCANTILIS, the sole path to eventual “humanness”.
Money - which by linking “same + different” to “numerical” EQUIVALENCE of VALUE has converted the SURPLUS of Agriculture into Civilizations. Money - which subsequently merged “numerical” EQUIVALENCE of VALUE with Technological Innovations to give us the Industrial Revolution and the MODERN ERA…
It is Money that enables the Democracy's infrastructure to create a variety of competing Social Agendas and present them to the Electorates every few years at various levels of civil administration.
It is Money that establishes the bond of mutual obligation between
a Donor and a Recipient - a bond far more predictable then the commitments
of any ostensibly selfless IDEOLOGY
wWhere should that Money
come from - that's the only question
Democracy is distorted
when the Public - entranced by the sloganeering of the process,
fails to grasp the link between Money and Life's indispensable instinct
of RESTRAINT
The most astute debates freely conducted in however fair election process relinquish their intellectual efficacy once their outcomes can be purchased, IN ADVANCE, by the “vested interests”.
Thus, whenever we despair at the disastrous effects which Violence-driven “dictatorships” are having on Societies, let us bear in mind that in a Donor-driven Democracy, the successful bidders are also its hidden “dictators”.
wIf Democracy is fully to serve the Public Good - its infrastructure
of political Parties and Processes must first be funded by the RELEVANT
DONOR; the
Tax-generated consolidated revenue of the Public.
So if the sorry state
of the Environment is our concern, we can't address it by attending
talk-shops, hugging trees, filing lawsuits or lobbying present-day
politicians.
wWe must organize and demand that the non-Public funding of Democracy
has to cease forthwith.
If the multi-millionaires in control of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Insurance Rackets DISTORT the Public's Health Resources until our wallets bleed - no point in complaining…
wWe must organize and demand that the non-Public funding of Democracy
has to cease forthwith.
If the essence of Life's survival - FOOD, is turning our Society
into lumps of grotesquely rollicking flesh - someone has been paying
Money for this bio-chemical sideshow to be permitted
How to
put an end to it?
wWe must organize and demand that the non-Public funding of Democracy
has to cease forthwith. Etc
etc
etc
2. As long as we allow
Democracy's Legal System to function as the means of COMMERCE instead
of Justice, only our Legal Costs - not Rights, will be "equal
before the Law".
As long as we allow that Legal System to defy the most pervasive
Constant of Life - "specialization", it will keep dragooning
all-comers to determine the "guilt" or "innocence"
of the Potentially "guilty" or "innocent" with
equally pervasive and often tragic futility.
As long as we allow that Legal System to gorge itself on Money that
cannot be explained by any LAWFUL activity - rather then institute
its confiscation,
it will continue to demoralize our Law Enforcement
agencies and perpetuate their gross corruptibility. Probably the
hardest nut to crack, but the method still hasn't changed -
wWe must organize and demand that the non-Public funding of Democracy
has to cease forthwith.
3.
Our CIVLITY depends on the "amount of WORK" available
for citizens of a Nation to "exchange" mutual BENEFITS
within the Law.
Western Nations should stop fooling themselves that the current
addiction to scouring the globe for the "highest BENEFIT"
at the "lowest PRICE" isn't diminishing the "amount
of WORK" available to their OWN citizens.
It's high time economic traitors of the West be asked to reflect on the “self-reference” inherent in purported BENEFIT of Globalization; “Why won't you offer YOUR OWN jobs to the “ lowest PRICE ” applicants across the world?”
4.
Western Civilization has enjoyed the last two centuries of Modern
Era by the grace of CRITICAL THINKING - an "intellectual outcome" of its Industrial
and Secular Revolutions.
However, whilst our Technologies advance unhindered - no effort
is spared by Religions of the West to undo Secularism and revert
to the currency that has maintained their gangster-like predecessors
in authority throughout the darkness of Feudalism
And nowhere is that yearning for the good old times now manifesting
itself as defiantly as it does in United States - a Nation to whom,
along with Great
Britain, Western Civilization owes the last six decades of its Freedom.
wFreedom is an expression of social EMOTIONS. For millennia, it had
been denied and fought for by social emotions
When won - Freedom
can only
be protected and passed to others by social emotions.
As long as the civil society of United States continues to slide
towards an "Iranian model" of morality, it will be held
to ridicule and eventually - held in "contempt" the rest of Western
Civilization.
When leaders
of the one Nation in History to which "greatness" applies
are increasingly looked on by their Western peers as pious demagogues
bereft of CRITICAL THINKING, it becomes more then an embarrassing
anomaly in the broad sweep of American affairs
Once the social emotion of "contempt" attaches to such
leaders intuitively,
then no matter how geo-politically justified their decisions, those
decisions are viewed - and are instantly DISTORTED, through the
lens of "contempt".
The result? A problem the West shouldn't additionally have to deal
with if it is to deal EFFECTIVELY with the challenges ahead.
|